Lower Costs and Successful Trips Matter Most

“Which of these four travel-related goals is most important to your senior management?”

The answer?  Lower travel costs is the most important goal, while more successful trips came in a very close second, according to the survey tClara just ran.

If you group the three non-cost goals into something like “Travel Impact Goals”, you see that this group gets a total of 58% of the top goal choices.  So while lower costs may have squeaked out a first-place finish, I’d say that cost takes a back seat to business impact.

I’ll go further by wondering how many travel buyers really, truly know their senior management’s top travel-related goal.

My long-standing impression is that travel buyers, as a whole, are trained to believe that cost is king; that savings is the main goal.

But doesn’t is seem that most companies would choose to have more successful trips over lower trip costs?  Maybe there are a few industries that need only an acceptable level of success in their trips, and are right to believe that spending more per trip is a waste of money.

But many, probably most, industries would benefit from having more successful trips, in that the return on these more successful trips far outweighs their extra costs.

Travel buyers, take the guesswork out of this really important issue.  Ask your senior management team what they really want from all their spend on travel. Then design your travel programs accordingly.

P.S. The 79 responses came from anonymous, self-qualified travel buyers primarily from the U.S.; there was no significant difference between the US-based responses and the non-US based responses.

4 thoughts on “Lower Costs and Successful Trips Matter Most

  1. Hi Scott!
    Very interesting article and fully agree! What is the definition of a successful trip by senior leadership and what do they use for metrics? Thanks. L

    • Hi Laurie, the survey did not provide any definitions, nor did we ask how folks are measuring this thing.

      In the past, tClara has used the term “Trip Scrap Rate”, defined as a road warrior’s self-estimated share of trips over the last 12 months that turned out to be not worthwhile. Our research shows this is somewhere between 10% and 20%, and it depends on the type of travel policy the road warrior is managed by. Cost-focused policies correlate with higher trip scrap rates.

  2. In my experience, when it comes to the entire ground transportation area, you can improve on price, overall service experience and improve the duty of care if you source properly. Then it is essential for the company to enforce the new suppliers and the new policies. Otherwise nothing changes and the savings, the improved service and the improved duty of care remain the same.

    • Dave, what would you say is the most common reason for your clients to source the ground category – savings, safety, or better service/more successful trips?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.